✓ Solo advertisers who spend enough that one corrected budget decision can cover the subscription
✓ Affiliate marketers who need campaign, link, conversion, and postback visibility
✓ Lean direct-response teams wanting attribution without a complex enterprise routing stack
✓ Small agencies that can match the plan's site, ad-account, team, and retention limits
— Teams that only need free channel and onsite reporting from GA4
— Buyers seeking a creative-analytics or incrementality platform rather than campaign attribution
— High-volume media-buying operations that need complex routing, many workspaces, or very large event allowances
— Anyone unwilling to maintain naming, UTMs, conversion definitions, consent, and verification
Current plan structure
| Decision factor | Starter | Standard | Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $79 | $199 | $349 |
| Tracked visitors | 10,000 | 100,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Team access | 1 user | 2 additional team members | Unlimited team members |
| Ad accounts per platform | 1 | 5 | Unlimited |
| Data retention | 6 months | 1 year | Verify current listing |
| Best initial question | Can one small operation use the core? | Do scale and attribution features justify the jump? | Does volume and team access justify Pro? |
Start with the constraint most likely to force an upgrade
The visible plan boundary is not just visitor volume. Count sites or stores, users, ad accounts per platform, active ads using AI insights, and the retention period your analysis requires. Standard adds advanced attribution, offline sales tracking, bot and click-fraud protection, onboarding, and unlimited affiliate campaigns according to the current pricing page.
Use break-even as a decision threshold, not a promise
A $199 monthly plan needs to prevent or recover more than $199 of decision loss to justify itself before labor and implementation cost. That might mean stopping a losing campaign sooner, correcting attribution, or moving spend toward a verified winner. Write the decision and its possible dollar value before the trial. If you cannot, the tool may be premature.
Annual billing lowers the displayed monthly equivalent but raises commitment
The official page shows two months free on yearly billing. That saves money only if the platform remains useful throughout the term. Use the trial to validate data capture, reports, team workflows, and at least one real decision before making the longer commitment.
What supports this answer—and what still needs checking
This guide draws on ClickMagick plans and pricing, ClickMagick terms of service. The official sources are used for current product capabilities, terms, and merchant-controlled details. Independent confirmation is limited, so the conclusion stays deliberately narrow.
Source dates matter. Treat the reasoning as a decision aid, then verify any price, plan limit, eligibility rule, compatibility claim, or commercial term that would materially change what you do. The source ledger identifies the underlying records, dates, and independent references instead of asking you to trust an unexplained score.
Turn this guide into a decision you can defend
Write down the outcome you need, the constraint most likely to block it, and the evidence that would change your mind. Then test the decision against the checks below. This keeps a polished feature list from outweighing cost, fit, or operational reality.
If those checks still leave an open question, continue with Review. It is the next closest decision, not simply the next page in a sequence.
Sources used for this page
These records support the facts and comparisons above. Merchant-controlled records are identified without adding an untracked purchase path.
- ClickMagick plans and pricing — MERCHANT · checked 2026-08-22
- ClickMagick terms of service — MERCHANT · checked 2026-08-22